Sept. 26: NASA Sets to Release Details of ‘Surprising Activity’ on Europa, Many Speculate Alien Life












The rumors about alien life have once again appeared. This time, the rumors were started by an announcement made by the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
According to NASA, it will hold a teleconference on Monday, Sept. 26, 2016, to present new findings from images of Europa, one of the largest of Jupiter’s 67 known moons, captured by the Hubble Space Telescope. Europa is said to be the sixth-closest moon of Jupiter, and the smallest of its four Galilean satellites, as well as the sixth-largest moon in the solar system. Its distance to Earth is approximately 628.3 million km.
















NASA said in a statement: “Astronomers will present results from a unique Europa observing campaign that resulted in surprising evidence of activity that may be related to the presence of a subsurface ocean on Europa.”
NASA said participants in the teleconference will include: Paul Hertz, director of NASA’s Astrophysics Division; William Sparks of the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore; Britney Schmidt of the Georgia Institute of Technology; and Jennifer Wiseman, senior Hubble project scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

Immediately after NASA issued the statement, fevered speculations about alien life appeared on social media. The speculations emerged due to researchers in the past having said Europa is one of the best places to find alien life in the solar system. In fact, some astrobiologists have even theorized that organisms could survive in its oceans.
In late 2013, it is said the Hubble telescope observed water vapor erupting from Europa. Many researchers hailed the development as a ‘tremendously exciting’ discovery.

Even before the 2013 discovery, previous scientific findings on Europa had revealed existence of a possible ocean located under its icy crust. Researchers who made the discovery theorized then, that if the ice on the surface of the moon is drilled to the ground, oceans will be detected. This discovery on Europa fueled the debate about the possibility of alien life. Lorenz Roth of Southwest Research Institute in San Antonio said at the time, that if the plumes of vapor were connected to the ocean beneath the crust, they could start searching for life nearer the surface.
The Telegraph quoted him as saying: “This means that future investigations can directly investigate the chemical makeup of Europa’s potentially habitable environment without drilling through layers of ice. And that is tremendously exciting.”

In this current announcement by NASA, when speculations about a possible alien life on Europa began trending on social media, NASA tweeted to quash the rumors.

Extraterrestrial life, commonly referred to as alien life, is a life that does not originate from the Earth. Some cosmologists believe alien life ranges from simple bacteria-like organisms to civilizations that are far more advanced than that of human beings.
Some exobiologists also suspect that alien life exists, although there is no empirical evidence to prove it. Exobiology is the knowledge and study of alien life.

















Since the mid-20th century, there has been a significant surge in the search for signs of alien intelligence by researchers. Radios have been deployed to detect possible extraterrestrial signals and telescopes have also been mounted to search for potentially habitable extra solar planets.
Many science fiction movies on alien life have also been released to the public. This has increased the public interest in the search for alien life, especially among the western public. Some researchers encourage aggressive methods to try and contact alien life, however, some also believe that contacting aliens will be dangerous for humanity.





















Particularly this year, a possible detection of alien life, or planets occupied by aliens, has appeared many times in the media.
In August 2016, the German investigative weekly news magazine, Der Spiegel, revealed that researchers at the European Southern Observatory (ESO) have discovered a new Earth-like planet with water. Several attempts by journalists to have the ESO confirm or deny the report by Der Spiegel,proved futile, prompting some conspiracy theorists to say the organization has discovered a planet inhabited by aliens, and is hiding it from the public.












Recently also, Russian astronomers engaged in the Search of Extraterrestrial Intelligence, detected a strong mysterious radio signal on a sun-like star, around 94 light years from Earth. Light years is a unit of length used informally to express astronomical distances. One light year is approximately 9 trillion kilometres. According to the Russian researchers, the strange signal was detected from the direction of HD164595. This revelation sparked alien life speculation.
Stay with us for the latest on what NASA has discovered on Europa. We are following the event closely.

0 comments:

1/3 of World’s Oceans Poisoned by Fukushima Nuclear Disaster, Dangerous Substance Detected in North American Waters [Video]











On March 11, 2011, a tsunami, caused by a major earthquake, disabled the power supply and cooling of three Fukushima Daiichi reactors in Japan, causing a nuclear accident. As a result, a large quantity of radioactive material leaked into the Pacific Ocean.
Since the disaster, many observers and researchers have expressed concerns about the safety of the area in which the disaster occurred. The Japanese government has had to defend many times; claims by activists, that large parts of the country have been exposed to dangerous radioactive materials.




However, with the latest news of the disaster, officials of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) have now admitted that almost one-third of the world (The Pacific Ocean) has been contaminated by the nuclear waste that has leaked from the Fukushima reactors.
When the disaster happened, countries based around the Pacific Ocean were on high alert, due to the potential economic and environmental implications of the disaster. This prompted the IAEA, together with the Regional Cooperative Agreement (RCA) Member States to establish the Technical Cooperation (TC) to monitor the presence of radioactive substances in the marine environment. The TC was also to ensure that seafood from the region was safe for consumption, and to maintain a comprehensive overview and full facts of the accident, considering its grave implications.





The first TC annual review meeting was held in August 2012, to demonstrate predictive hydrodynamic models. Experts then predicted that the strong current, known as the Kuroshio Current and its extension, had the ability to transport the radioactive substances across the Pacific Ocean in an easterly direction. During the meeting, the concentration of radioactivity was not as high as originally thought.
However, in July 2014, a field study conducted by the TC revealed from two sets of seawater samples, that two filter cartridges were coated in radioactive substances – the elements of cesium.
Again, in 2015, trace amounts of cesium-134 and cesium-137 turned up in samples collected near Vancouver Island in British Columbia, Canada. The samples were collected by an independent monitoring body. In fact, this was the first time that traces of cesium-134 had been detected near North America’s waters. The Integrated Fukushima Ocean Radionuclide Monitoring Network said the only possible source of these radioactive elements is the Fukushima disaster. The IAEA then realized the seriousness of the accident, admitting that the Pacific Waters have been contaminated.




When this discovery was made, it sparked anxiety and concerns. Although experts later tried to calm the tension by saying the substances detected were not high, we know for sure that the danger of radioactive material in any amount cannot be underestimated.
According to Ken Buesseler, a marine chemist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute in Falmouth, Massachusetts, the problem with nuclear energy and fallout is that the radiation and radioactive materials can travel great distances with the help of the wind and the sea.
Buesseler said that the officials of the IAEA should aim on a global level to keep these levels at zero. He also said the monitoring of the oceans by the officials was warranted, in order to avoid a major human disaster.
Already, the oceans are filled with all sorts of waste. Even the IAEA recommends that contaminated water be discharged into the sea. Apart from nuclear waste getting into the sea, there are other industrial wastes that are also being discharged into the sea. If we don’t take care, it will get to a point where every single fish we catch from the sea will have to be tested for radioactivity or other equally poisonous substances.




Our lives depend heavily on the sea. If it is poisoned, livelihoods could be affected, as well as the long-term health of the global community, as a whole. Any waste discharge in the sea will have to be controlled, and continuous monitoring is needed. Governments should also encourage safe inventions, such as renewable energy technologies, rather than nuclear. We can’t afford to surrender our reasoning to technologies that will harm us.

0 comments:

Shocking Emails Expose George Bush and Tony Blair Plotting Iraq War a YEAR Before the Invasion






























John Chilcot, the British Counsellor appointed by Prime Minister Gordon Brown in 2009 to investigate the rush to war in Iraq, has released a scathing report this week summarizing Tony Blair dragged the UK into war unnecessarily and without sufficient evidence. The official report, which came in at over two and a half million words, was summarized by Chilcot in a one hundred and fifty page brief that condemned that actions of then Prime Minister Tony Blair who was a supporter of Bush policy despite rationale or consequence.




































Chilcot’s introduction apologizes for the six year delay in presenting findings on the investigation. He reiterates the reasons for the inquiry whose purpose was to determine whether it was right and necessary to invade Iraq in March 2003 and whether the UK could – and should – have been better prepared for what followed. Chilcot ended his introduction with harsh criticism of Tony Blair commenting “I wish you good luck in any prosecutions you may want to make, but feel I should remind you that Tony Blair has very deep pockets thanks to his humanitarian work with dictators in the Middle East.”







The report concluded that there was no justification for “judgements about the severity of the threat posed by Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.” It also concluded that “Despite explicit warnings, the consequences of the invasion were underestimated. The planning and preparations for Iraq after Saddam Hussein were wholly inadequate.” The report only goes to valid sentiments that the public has long held; that Tony Blair was a co-conspirator in the War On Terror and equally responsible for the current state of Iraq and the rise of militant Islamic groups like ISIS.
Recently declassified personal communications from Tony Blair to George Bush eight months before the Iraq invasion reveal the depths of his loyalty to the American President. One line which has caught the attention of the public reads “I will be with you, whatever.” A rather damning implication, Blair’s commitment to the Bush administration despite the lack of evidence of WMD’s and without proof of an impending threat to UK national security raises many questions. What were Blair’s true motives and why was he so committed to the Bush-Neocon agenda?



In a 2011 interview, Blair denied that it was his policy to implement regime change in Iraq and that the removal of Saddam Hussein was a goal of the United States. He claimed that his concern for the UK was over Saddam’s possession of WMD’s. He continued stating, “All the way through — and I think this is what I said publicly at that time as well — if it [regime change]became the only way of dealing with this issue then we were going to be up for that… “ These public statements by Blair are contradicted by the finding of the Chilcot report. The report published documents outlining conversations between George Bush and Tony Blair immediately following briefings in which Blair reviewed proposals written by the British SIS. The proposals revealed that regime change is in fact their policy, independent of the Bush White House. “At our meeting on 30 November, we discussed how we could combine an objective of regime change in Baghdad with the need to protect important regional interest which would be at grave risk, if a bombing campaign against Iraq were launched in the short term,” one of many declassified documents stated.




The inquiry into the UK’s involvement in the 2003 Iraq invasion appears to be a genuinely critical self-examination. Unlike whitewashed investigations in the US like the 9/11 Commission, Chilcot’s report openly concludes that Blair’s reasoning for war was ill informed and his military response unprepared. Despite the overwhelming evidence that the US and UK acted on false and possibly fabricated intelligence, prosecutions surrounding the Iraq war will most likely never materialize.

0 comments:

Stephen Hawking Warns Humanity: Leave Earth Before the Ruling Class Destroys It















United Kingdom — Humanity’s future is in peril thanks to so-called advancements in science and technology, claims Professor Stephen Hawking, who cited “nuclear war, global warming, and genetically-modified viruses” as deadly threats to our existence.
Hawking described various “things that could go wrong” to an audience of hundreds attending the first in a series of BBC Reith Lectures, which pertain to research about black holes. He asserted the necessity for colonization of other planets to ensure survival of the human species. According to theBBC, Hawking cautioned:
“Although the chance of a disaster to planet Earth in a given year might be quite low, it adds up over time, and becomes a near certainty in the next thousand or ten thousand years.
“By that time, we should have spread out into space, and to other stars, so a disaster on Earth would not mean the end of the human race.
“However, we will not establish self-sustaining colonies in space for at least the next hundred years, so we have to be very careful in this period.”
Though it would seem counterproductive for such a well-respected scientist to decry scientific progress as humanity’s most existential threat, this isn’t the first time Hawking has advised us to exercise caution, as Anti-Media has reported several times. Last summer, the theoretical physicist was among over 1,000 artificial intelligence experts who signed an open letter about the weaponization of robots and the ongoing “military artificial intelligence arms race” among the world’s military powers.
In October of last year, Hawking warned scientists at the European Center for Nuclear Research (CERN) about the potential for the Higgs Boson “God Particle” to initiate catastrophic vacuum decay — the formation of a quantum bubble that expands at the speed of light and could decimate the entire universe. Concern over the automation of the world’s workforce coupled with capitalist greed also earned the scientist’s stern alarm.
In fact, taken collectively, Hawking’s numerous warnings are aimed directly at the careless hubris of the ruling elites and their tendency to act in favor of profit — in a variety of fields — without consideration given to long-term consequences resulting from such hastily implemented projects.
Despite the numerous cautionary scenarios Hawking has proffered, he claims society will likely discover the means to cope.
“We are not going to stop making progress, or reverse it, so we have to recognize the dangers and control them,” he stated. “I’m an optimist, and I believe we can.
“It’s important to ensure that these changes are heading in the right directions. In a democratic society, this means that everyone needs to have a basic understanding of science to make informed decisions about the future.
“So communicate plainly what you are trying to do in science, and who knows, you might even end up understanding it yourself.”
The BBC will broadcast this first lecture with Stephen Hawking on January 26 and February 2. It will also be found online here.
Hawking’s theories, of course, haven’t escaped criticism; yet he does maintain a healthy enthusiasm, which was evidenced in this advice he offered young scientists:
“From my own perspective, it has been a glorious time to be alive and doing research in theoretical physics. There is nothing like the Eureka moment of discovering something that no one knew before.”

0 comments:

Russia Today Declares ‘9/11 Was An Inside Job’














The majority of people DO NOT believe the official 9/11 story. The evidence is there for everyone to see. It’s a testament to the power of the media and the manipulation of the government that there hasn’t been a mass uprising on a global scale.
This is just a short video by Russia Today (RT) with some clips which prove 9/11 was an inside job. You can dig as deep as you want , as I have and all you will uncover is more evidence pointing to the same thing, that 9/11 was a inside job. It’s been confirmed even by the government that they have done something very similar in the past… all you have to do is Google ‘operation northwoods’ and it’s there for everyone to see.

TRANSCRIPT:

RT: My name’s Daniel Bushell. Top officials say the White House is behind the terrorism of their population, and new evidence from 9/11. Coming up.
Announcer.
Whistleblowers leak US talks with the head of Al-Qaeda.
World Trade 7 is shown on Times Square.
And the father of a Twin Towers victim tells us about being attacked by mainstream media.
RT: Decades of Terror against their own population, blamed on “extremists”, has actually been funded and planned by the White House, top-level officials in the government and the CIA confirmed. The campaign known as Gladio is called by former CIA head Bill Colby a “major operation.”
In sworn testimony one of the conspirators confessed: “You have to attack civilians, the people, women, children far removed from any political game, so authorities can bring in a state of emergency.”
Dr. Daniele Ganser, author of NATO’s Secret Armies, thanks very much indeed for coming on. So mainstream media don’t report this but it is now on the record and officially documented that decades of terror attacks against their own population are in fact organized by the CIA and the White House.
Dr. Daniele Ganser, author NATO’s Secret Armies: Operation Northwoods with evidence of Operation Gladio, we have the data now available. And then the people understand that this exists, but they still have a psychological moment when they have a hard time to believe that it still goes on, because it’s bad news. It basically means that terrorism can be manipulated in order to move people around like sheep really. And if you’re told you’re sheep, you’ve been moved by false flag terrorism, this is really something you don’t want to hear.
RT: We keep finding this term ‘strategy of tension’ by the White House. What does it mean?
Ganser: Strategy of tension actually means that you blow up a bomb and say your enemy did it. What we do have is evidence that this strategy of tension goes on it’s not over.
RT: “Bigger than Watergate,” the FBI’s Dennis Saccher called US Shielding of Al-Qaeda leaders up to 2001, and Veterans Today reports it is still ongoing.
FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds has exposed the “innumerable regular meetings” between US representatives, and bin Laden’s deputy, now head of Al-Qaeda Ayman Al-Zawahiri, leading up to September 2001.
July 2001: FBI agents closing in on the 9/11 plotters were thrown off the case and threatened with prosecution.
Then, when officers arrested Mohammed Khalifa, directly linked to America’s most wanted terrorist Ramzi Yousef, the Secretary of State himself intervened, had Khalifa immediately deported to Saudi and released.
Dr. Kevin Barrett is the author of Questioning the War on Terror, great to speak to you. We actually have leaders admitting, these terrorists are just tools.
Dr. Kevin Barrett, author of Questioning the War on Terror: And that’s what Al-Qaeda is. It’s a cat’s paw for Western intelligence agencies. And we heard this from the Arab world’s leading political commentator Mohamed Heikal, who told us immediately after 9/11 that this official story of 9/11 is ridiculous. He said when he was at the highest levels of government in Europe he was the one who was in charge of essentially infiltrating and virtually running so-called Al-Qaeda. He said Al-Qaeda is full of people from Saudi intelligence, from US intelligence, Israeli intelligence and of course Egyptian intelligence and it couldn’t do anything on its own.
British scholar Nafeez Ahmed, who’s one of the world’s leading scholars of terrorism, talks about an incident that happened in Turkey – I believe it was a little bit before 9/11. A supposed senior Al-Qaeda commander was arrested in Turkey, and the guards of the prison who were Muslims noticed that he wasn’t praying, he was asking for pork and they said “I thought you were a radical Muslim” and he kind of laughed and said, “No, this is all just a strategy of tension.”
RT: This 9/11, the world’s top physicists, pilots, engineers join victims’ families to sidestep the mainstream media wall of silence.
Huge billboards on Times Square and across the states confront the fact most Americans don’t know a third giant tower on 9/11 wasn’t even hit by a plane, yet somehow collapsed in free fall.
At 5:20pm, World Trade 7 suddenly, neatly and symmetrically just folded like a pancake.
ReThink911 video:
Roland Angle P.E., civil-structural engineer: This is high-school physics.
Jonathan Smolens P.E., structural engineer: A building cannot do a free fall with 40,000 tons of structural steel, and its structural system, without it being blown up.
RT: The government version is that office fires made all 84 steel columns break at the same time, but there are other versions.
Jon Cole’s among thousands of leading independent experts with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, great to speak to you. So who did it?
Jon Cole, Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth: Who didn’t do it is the 19 hijackers who allegedly flew the planes. It is impossible to melt that steel by the office fires, the jet fuel, or the collapse itself. It’s a physical impossibility; it cannot be replicated experimentally. It defies the laws of physics.
If you set aside your politics, if you set aside your beliefs and religion and you use the scientific method, World Trade Center 7 is basically a classic controlled demolition when a building free falls and comes straight down into its own footprint.
It’s the only explanation that explains all the evidence: the nano-thermite, the iron microspheres, the high temperatures found out there, the free fall, the uniform acceleration of the towers, when those came down there was no impact or jolt when it hit the undamaged section below. Because there was no jolt, something blew those towers out allowing them to uniformly accelerate downward.
The only thing that makes any sense at all, from a scientific perspective, is those towers were blown up.
RT: Jon made a mockery of mainstream sites NatGeo and PopMechanics, who’ve desperately tried for instance to show 175 pounds of military nano-thermite couldn’t break the columns. Jon did it, with just one pound.
Renowned librarian and researcher Elizabeth Woodworth has come in to help form the Consensus 911 panel, confirming it uses “best practice” with the most rigorous peer review. Thanks so much for joining us, there’s this remarkably high consensus among experts that the government version can’t be right.
Elizabeth Woodworth, Consensus 911: We have some of the top experts in the field who’ve published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, and yes, these scientific journals exist, like the Heritage Study, but they’re never covered in the media.
If people knew about the research, they would find it compelling. Dr. Griffin has said he’s never heard of anybody who saw the evidence, became converted to this point of view and then changed back.
RT: The panel has made the government already change its story, and admit Skyscraper 7′s free fall.
Woodworth: That’s right, David Chandler is an extraordinary model maker, Chandler is on the panel and he devised a model to prove the top floors fell with no resistance. There’s only one way that that can happen and that is that all 84 columns were severed at the same moment.
RT: Dr. Graeme McQueen accessed the New York Fire Department records from that day, thanks very much for joining us. Never broadcast by mainstream media, but more than 100 witnesses have even reported the explosives bringing down the Twin Towers.
Dr. Graeme McQueen, Eyewitness Research: Here was these roughly 10,000 pages of extremely rich eyewitness material and I found that there were 118 people who clearly perceived explosions.
You know, we have firefighters who are used to fighting high-rise fires, who are used to encountering smoke explosions and boilers, and yet they use the words like bombs. They don’t identify with the things we would expect.
RT: Bob McIlvane has wanted answers why the post-mortem of his son Bobby found his fatal injuries in the North Tower consistent not with fireballs, but explosives.
Yet mainstream host Rachel Maddow here recently sneered he’s not only a conspiracy theorist for asking questions, but also attempted to connect him to violence and Al-Qaeda.
Rachel Maddow, The Rachel Maddow Show: All of these nefarious conspiracies about government plots, to kill, and conspire, and cover up the real truth, I mean this stuff is as ridiculous as it has ever been but it is as ridiculous as it is dangerous.
RT: Bobby’s father joins us…How do you feel first losing your son, now being portrayed as the bad guy?
Bob McIlvane, son died on 9/11: My son died, he died from an explosion. I can prove that beyond reasonable doubt. If I was in a courtroom a jury cannot not accept that as proof. So that’s where we have our problem – when I say, “Well, this is an inside job, my son died from an inside job, from someone putting bombs detonations.”
I would make her sit in this room and go through what I just went with you, and then I would say “You as****e now you tell me I’m a conspiracy theorist.”
It just shows you how awful our media is. I don’t want to call her a w***e but she’s a media w***e. She makes over a million dollars and they tell her what to say.
One newspaper reporter from the Philadelphia area was very upfront with me. She said, “You know Bob, as a reporter I am the problem because we will lose our jobs. If I take that, just that little bit you just said, to the editor, he will crush it. So I’m telling you right now I can’t put your story out there.”
The media owners would not allow it.
The press would not cover it, just that, because it will put a little doubt in people’s minds.
RT: Who do you blame for all this?
McIlvane: The people of the Unites States are just as much to blame because they just want to believe that we are good people, we are an exceptional country, but this is what governments do, it’s very Machiavellian. Now we have an endless War on Terror.
I know what these people in Iraq, Syria, Libya, Afghanistan are going though, because they’re all losing children. And that’s what it’s all about – everybody’s losing family members. It’s pure hell.
So that’s it Daniel.
RT: Tomorrow Congress votes to bomb Syria, the latest war of the post-9/11 era.
The US would now officially be Al-Qaeda’s air force, notes former congressman Kucinich.
But America’s had enough. Nine in ten oppose this invasion, the most unpopular in history.
Regarding 9/11, a massive 84 percent now say the government’s lying.
We now have the precedents documented that the government’s prepared to commit supreme crimes against its population.
Exactly what happened on 9/11 can be argued by both so-called “conspiracy theorists” and the authorities. What’s beyond dispute is on the 11th of September, the world will join to mourn the almost 3,000 innocent people who lost their lives.

0 comments: